First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
Documents Found: 6045 |
Title |
Forum |
Year |
Kothi Steel Ltd. vs DCIT
Validity of Notice-Section 147 of Income Tax Act, 1961. Reopening of assessment.-Petitioner sought to quash and set aside impugned notice by which AO in exercise of powers under Section 147 of Act has sought to reopen assessment. W [LexDoc Id : 507328]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2016 |
Narendra M. Rege and Meera Narendra Rege vs ITO
[LexDoc Id : 507282]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2016 |
Meghraj Jain Shikar vs ITO
[LexDoc Id : 507178]
|
ITAT (Chennai) |
2016 |
ACIT vs Ganesh Goyal
[LexDoc Id : 507170]
|
ITAT (Jaipur) |
2016 |
ACIT vs Melarcode K. Nandkumar
[LexDoc Id : 506892]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2016 |
Mansi Finance (Chennai) Ltd. vs ACIT
[LexDoc Id : 506891]
|
ITAT (Chennai) |
2016 |
Maruti Nandan Sah vs ITO
Validity of Notice-Section 147 and Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961. Reopening of assessment.-Petitioner sought to quash and set aside impugned notice by which AO in exercise of powers under Section 147 of Act has sought to reopen assessment. W [LexDoc Id : 507329]
|
HC (Uttarakhand) |
2016 |
Virbhadra Singh and Ors. vs Deputy Commissioner and Ors.
Validity of proceedings-Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961. Jurisdictional error.-Proceedings were initiated against petitioners under Section 148 of Act. Whether, proceedings were rightly iniated against petitioner under Section 14 [LexDoc Id : 507311]
|
HC (Himachal Pradesh) |
2016 |
ACIT vs Vinayak Remedies Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 507045]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2016 |
ITO vs M.L. Creations
[LexDoc Id : 507038]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2016 |
Shree Sai Oil Company vs DCIT
[LexDoc Id : 506990]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2016 |
Sheela Jain vs ITO
[LexDoc Id : 506989]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2016 |
Shafali Jain vs ITO
[LexDoc Id : 506986]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2016 |
Lubrizol Advanced Materials India (P) Ltd vs ACIT
[LexDoc Id : 506936]
|
ITAT (Ahmedabad) |
2016 |
ITO vs Ganga Contracts and Projects Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 506933]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2016 |
Mother Dairy Fruit and Vegetable (P) Ltd. vs S.K. Raheem and Ors.
Infringement of trademark-Permanent injunction-Trademark ‘MOTHER DAIRY" registered in name of plaintiff. Plaintiff sought reliefs of permanent injunction, damages, rendition of accounts, delivery u [LexDoc Id : 507135]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
AZ Tech India and Ors. vs Intex Technologies India Ltd. and Ors.
Ad interim injunction-Expenditure-Plaintiffs sought ad interim injunction against defendants from using trademark 'AQUA'. Whether, ad interim injunction as sought by plaintiff should b [LexDoc Id : 507132]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
CIT vs Gulab Devi Memorial Hospital Trust
[LexDoc Id : 535924]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2016 |
Tribune Trust vs CIT and Anr.
CIT vs Improvement Trust
[LexDoc Id : 535923]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2016 |
Gulbrandsen Chemicals (P) Ltd. vs DCIT
Expenditure-Enduring nature-Whether, AO has rightly held that very accounting treatment given by assessee in books of accounts, proves that expenditure in question cannot be allo [LexDoc Id : 507583]
|
ITAT (Ahmedabad) |
2016 |
Pratibha Pipes and Structural Consortium vs DCIT
DCIT vs Pratibha Pipes and Structural Consortium
[LexDoc Id : 507289]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2016 |
Gujarat Farm Seeds (P) Ltd. vs DCIT
[LexDoc Id : 507173]
|
ITAT (Ahmedabad) |
2016 |
Prius Auto Industries Ltd. and Ors. vs Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha
[LexDoc Id : 507148]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
Satish Kumar vs ITO
[LexDoc Id : 506985]
|
ITAT (Bangalore) |
2016 |
Sanjay Verma vs ACIT
[LexDoc Id : 506943]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2016 |
|
First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
|